Actually most of it is, and always has been positive. However, you also get the other types. I classify them as, a)Hasbara-paid israeli youth counteracting what they deem as anti-semitic on the net...or b) trolls - they will nay-say anything you write and apparently get all goose-pimply when you react emotionally. Or c) those that are truly so steeped in the indoctrination of our rulers in this "age of the jew", that they feel compelled to straighten me out on a few issues.
The first two types don't get published here. The last one gives me pause to reflect and assess how well I am doing in this personal quest of mine. These are normally considerate and thoughtful people. They are usually almost pleasant in their rants, so I try to be in return.
Yesterday I received such a comment on my last article. I not only chose to publish it along with the other positive comments, I thought this a good opportunity to rebut a few points about which "anonymous" has attempted to make...and to make my response an entire post. It could get long. You might want to read it in shifts.
Firstly, I am grateful for the comment. Really, I am. And I admire Mr./Ms Anon for commenting in this fashion. It gives me a chance to air my position concerning judaism for those that require a bit more fundamental explanation. I have a tendency to move a bit too fast for some...assume that everyone is with me on some basic things. The comment that follows clearly shows how many are not:
Our commenter then states that I am somehow ironic because I bleat on about the 'holohoax' and yet I endorse the death of all things judaic. I'm afraid I don't really get that one. Firstly I have never endorsed anyone's "death". I certainly endorse the death or universal banning of judaism as a cult. I thought I had made that clear here many times. Perhaps not. I understand that when the general populace of this planet grasps the havoc that this cult has brought to us...yes, indeed...there will be death. I will not be one of those causing it. Nor do I advocate violence in any form. Even my most ardent detractors would not assert that I have ever done so.
Our reader goes on to list the anomalies that I ascribe to the machinations of those that follow this religion. I will go him one better. I would start around 1744 with the birth of Mayer Amschel Rothschild(nee Bauer). It was he that brought usury to world politics. It was he that financed both sides of the Napoleonic wars. It was he that through the financial empire he created, essentially purchased Britain. From that period to today, the practice of money changing became a dangerous political tool used by his family and all the jewish bankers with which he surrounded himself. This is all a matter of factual history and I won't go into the details here, but I suggest Mr/Ms Anon avails themselves of such research.
As far as our reader's assertion that jewish zionists do not own the Western media...well, that is almost too ridiculous to respond to. Any even casual research will confirm their ownership/control. I won't spend any effort in re-proving that point.
I am then accused of a "catch 22" because I understand the above fact to be true...and so I tell my readers not to trust their media. How is that a "catch 22"? As I remember the book and how it defines it...a catch 22 refers to contradictory rules. As in, you can't get out of flying bombing missions because you are crazy, because no one that is crazy is allowed to fly bombing missions. I don't see the contradictions in what I bleat on about. Perhaps I am crazy?
I agree, I have HAD to devote quite a bit of my life to this hateful cause. I wouldn't be able to sleep if I didn't. I hate the jewish religion. Period. Those that are taught it and choose to follow it, ARE despicable.
There are many groups of people that have conquered and ruled the world. Or the world known to them at the time. If I had lived in ancient Rome, I would have been scrawling graffiti and attending protests of their hegemony. It was no less than what I see as the ashkanazi plan for domination. Had I lived under the rule of the Catholic church of the middle ages, I would have decried the reigning Pope's marketing of indulgences to guild the church and to launch crusades.
The judaic are just the latest political assholes that have gained power in the world...with a twist. Their religion actually encourages such plundering...if it is for jewish exhaltation only. Lastly our friend implores: "...if you truly are for world peace, start advocating it."
I am not for world peace. I thought that was clear. I am for world JUSTICE. Period. "Peace" is usually accomplished at the end of a gun. Without justice, there is no true peace. Give the people of the world the justice that the ruling tribe has denied them...and real peace will follow.
Perhaps I am being too hard on Mr/Ms Anon. I have used them as an example of the readers that peruse my site and somehow just don't get it. Although I think I have stated my position over there at the left rather clearly...many still insist on putting words in my mouth and misunderstanding what I feel is my mission here.
I welcome criticism such as this... at times. It's a chance to get back to basics.