Thursday, February 17, 2011

Just A Snippit...

You decide...israhell gonna get a spanking?

Source

WASHINGTON – In a dramatic departure from longstanding policy, the United States intends to support a United Nations Security Council resolutions censuring Israel for building settlements in Palestinian territory.
The Obama administration told Arab governments Tuesday it will back a draft resolution saying the Security Council "does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlement activity," according to Foreign Policy magazine.
The language, which was confirmed to Foreign Policy by two Security Council diplomats, calls the Israeli settlements "a serious obstacle to the peace process." It says the Security Council "condemns all forms of violence, including rocket fire from Gaza, and stresses the need for calm and security for both peoples."
The Obama administration has used similar language to criticize Israel on settlements, but has not supported any such UN resolution condemning Israel. Doing so would constitute a significant US policy shift towards its ally.
But the US also intends to veto a stronger non-binding resolution by the 15-member body denouncing the Israeli settlements as "illegal." The new language was part of a compromise put forth by Susan Rice, the US Ambassador to the UN.
The earlier resolution was offered by the Palestinian Authority and garnered nearly 120 co-sponsors, all Arab and non-aligned states. UN diplomats told Reuters it would probably be approved by all Security Council members other than the US.
It says that "Israeli settlements established in the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, are illegal and constitute a major obstacle to the achievement of a just, lasting and comprehensive peace."
The US has unilaterally vetoed or declined to support dozens of UN Security Council resolutions condemning Israel during the last several decades. For the US to support even the less harsh language is a remarkable development.
Palestinian leaders reportedly rejected the US offer on the new resolution, seeking instead to push for a vote Friday on the original language designating the Israel settlements "illegal." It raised the prospect that the Obama administration would cast its first Security Council veto.

UPDATE: Apparently they were just teasing...

8 comments:

veritas6464 said...

Hey Timster,...Mmmm, I just don't see it being anything but a spin to whitewash the issue.

Obongo's their patsy and the yids have thousands of resolutions against them, many directed at the settlements crime that never get mentioned and they don't bat an eyelid about, so...another day another shekel, as far as I can see.

Hey, wouldn't it be nice to see obongo say something really nasty about the yids, then survive an assassination attempt, run for the safety of the loyal military (is there any?) and become part of the resistance: Now that's a movie, huh?

veritas (daydream believer)

chuckyman said...

Indeed Timster. Just as the puppeteers ruling the US seek to set flame to the Arab crescent and the Middle East in the name of democracy they really don’t want to be seen publically as a Zionist stooge and yet again veto another resolution.

It is much better to appear as separate agendas rather than one sweeping pincher movement.

Timster said...

V - I hereby volunteer to direct it!

Timster said...

Chucky - You are probably right.

Anonymous said...

No Spanky! Just Hanky Panky!
GLENVIEW

Timster said...

Glen...I like that!

veritas6464 said...

Hey Timster,..In the spirit of good humour: I submit this for you and chuckyman, pleeease get it:

“A friend of mine just started his own business, making landmines that look like prayer mats.

It's doing very well: He says Prophets are going through the roof.”

veritact?

And I'm a bible-thumper! What's the werld coming to?

Bible-thumper:

Drunken Bar-room brawler - check

Obsessive compulsive - check

Smart-arse - check

Bent as a ten bob watch - check

Blogger - check

sweet!

chuckyman said...

Boom Boom V (grin)