Sunday, August 15, 2010

Kissy-Face and Judaic Democracy...





WARNING: THE FOLLOWING IS NOT FOR THE FAINT OF HEART OR THE PRUDISH



This is is going to be another one of those LONG stream-of-whatever wandering thingys that you might want to skip altogether if you are looking for any kind of structure. Just some thoughts I wanted to get down in pixels, that have bothered me over the years...



You will have to forgive an old guy that keeps referencing the '60s. That was when I was coming of age. I won't rehash what it was like personally...we all have our memories and I won't bore you with mine...especially in an idyllic, nostalgic light. Suffice it to say that it was a crossroads of sorts. For this nation, for myself and many I knew personally. It was then, when all things sexual began to blur like an impressionist painting, or your windshield in the car-wash. This was the era of the explosion of the pornography business, which became a wholly jewish($$$) enterprise...and I have watched it change over the years. From it's early days of a depiction of just straight sex, to the current trends of shaved vaginas( simulated pedophilia) to the entirely repulsive REAL pedophilia and signature "scatology", the jewish mindset is slowly becoming more apparent.


Pornography is nothing new. Only the definition has been blurred over the past few decades. Jews did not invent it. They have only profited from it. There has been documented prurient imagery and erotica since the dawn of man. For the most part...male generated. It has long been established that the male mind is stimulated visually, and that tactile stimulation is generally reserved for the female of the species. This is gender-specific behaviour that goes back....well, way before the late 1960's.


Also, of course...homosexuality didn't just arrive on the planet. Even same-sex child molestation was considered normal in some ancient societies. The Spartan army for instance in the 6th to the 4th centuries BC, trained their young lads with mentoring soldiery that also schooled them in the ways of man-boy sex. It is, unfortunately a matter of fact. Not particularly pretty to most people today...but that is changing.

Until very recently in western society, such same-sex goings-on was more or less hidden from general public view...because...well, it's kind of disgusting...and it is not the norm. It doesn't propagate the species. It is essentially selfish in nature. And most of us do not even want to know the mechanics of it...specifically male homosexual behaviour. Many in the "gay" community have labeled this reticence to accept such behaviour, as homophobic. By definition that means "fear of homosexuality". Again, as in so many things in the Occident...a misnomer.
I can't speak for women, but I can say that I know few if any male heterosexuals ,that "fear" homosexuals or their lifestyle. Perhaps homo-disgust would be a better word for what we "straights" feel. But words such as"disgust", and "prosperity" seem to have become obsolete...I wonder why.
Generally speaking, gay males are hardly anything to fear physically, unless you fear "Bubba rape" in a close quartered prison cell. Maybe. But most western males don't intend to place themselves is such a cell or situation.


Homophobia, is wholly jewish terminology as I am sure you are aware. It implies that all people have latent homosexual tendencies. They don't. That's the ashkanazi Freud speaking. The entire "gay-pride" movement is a yiddish one, as a matter of fact and I have found that most everything that has the word "pride" attached to it, can be traced back to the tribe. It all stems from the divide-and-conquer mentality that is prevalent in the west at the hands of the hebrews in charge at the moment.


That's as may be, but not what I'm on about right now.


I would be willing to bet my best fishing rod that I have had for 30 years and made with my own hands... as morally defacing as it appears on the surface, and knowing that it was broadcast around the world...that the image at the top of this post, will stimulate at least 90% of those males that view it. Whew. That was a hell of an awkward sentence. You might want to read it again. Or in other words, watching Madonna and Britney kissing on some jew-award show will get a guy going. Guaranteed.


Why?


I have given this a LOT of thought over the years. Maybe too much.
However, I have deduced this all by myself. Ha! (well, maybe I'm stating the obvious for some)


Of those years in the sixties(oh no...here he goes again about the damned hippie era) the experiences that stick out in my mind were mostly about changing sexual mores'. Although as I look back at it now, I see that it was driven by jewish interests.
So how can the media get by with essentially lesbian porn on internationally broadcast extravaganzas like this?
Because although men have been fed heterosexual pornography for millennium, it is basically bi-sexual . If you stop and think about it, while viewing standard porn, men are viewing males as well as females in a sexual performance. As a male, I don't want to look at a male in sexual congress with anything...man or woman. So, the alternative to such "iffy" enterprises is girl-girl sex. It's that simple. It is the male being stimulated visually by a sexual depiction without having to view another man in a sexual context. Most men prefer it and the industry is aware of it. As are most women in general. And women having DNA instructions, that....no matter how much they resist it...tell them to please their men(especially on a sexual level) are more willing to indulge in homosexual acts whether they enjoy it or not. Of course this is a mere generalization, and more of a trend(that is becoming more and more popular),but it is fed by a jewish-male dominated media that not only understands the power($$$) of the image to stimulate, but how it also affords a platform for the reciprocal male-male sexual lifestyle. By that I mean, "what's good for the goose is good for the gander". If you buy lesbians...and they KNOW that as a normally adjusted male, you will...then you will at least entertain the notion of male homosexuality.

So when a gay judge in California overturns the popular vote of a precedent-setting same-sex marriage proposition(whew...I finally got to the point!), it should come as no surprise. However, you have the jew to thank/blame.


Therefore, in pre-Christian and post-ANTI-Christian societies(you might as well face it Christians, you are living in a jewish world in which you are fed to the lions daily), we see homosexual prevalence. So where's the surprise? It is jewish-democracy in action. We brought it on ourselves. As heterosexual males we desire to witness lesbian activity...then included-at no extra cost-we get "gays". And you WILL accept it...and you WILL like it.

16 comments:

Anonymous said...

I salute your style of writing and totally agree.

Elvis Hitler said...

A hot lesbian moved in the section 8 shithole geto here and she loves to tease in her short shorts. I support homosexuals when both chicks are hot. I don't really care or want to know what people are doing on their own time in their own bedroom but I don't want their rainbow stickers, chaps and buttplugs lifestyle in my face.

Timster said...

thanks.

veritas6464 said...

Hey Timster,...I only popped in to share a treat with you, however being how prolific you are lately –Hey! Another post: Excellent, apart from the 'hebrew' reference, this term is an anglicized bastardization of 'Ebre' the name of a tribe that the dirty ones also, pretend to be! Anyhoo; here's your treat:

Australian geologist Ian Plimer argues that, for many agnostics and atheists, the cause of environmentalism has replaced organized religion as a matter of personal faith.

-----

While the world's religions have inspired stunning acts of creation, they also have been implicated in some of the darkest deeds in human history.

If God cannot be blamed for such moments of evil, His priests and prophets at least have a case to answer.

So what might they say? That religion is unfairly blamed -- and that we should look to other factors? Admit that there are problems but argue that on balance the good outweighs the bad? That there is no alternative; the people need religion like they need air? - Intelligence Squared.

Ian Plimer is Emeritus Professor of Earth Sciences at the University of Melbourne and Professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide. He is a prominent critic of creationism, and is famous for a debate with creationist Duane Gish in which he asked his opponent to hold live electrical cables to prove that electromagnetism was 'only a theory'. He has published over 120 academic papers and six popular books. He is also a prominent member of the Australian Skeptics. In 2004 he was awarded the Clark Medal by the Royal Society of NSW. In the late 1990s, Plimer was involved in legal proceedings concerning the location of Noah's Ark, in which Plimer was ultimately unsuccessful. His most recent book, Telling Lies for God, has a forward by Archbishop Peter Hollingsworth. Professor Plimer argues that religion is important for the fabric of society.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idYdVQ6nwfA

http://fora.tv/2008/08/19/Would_We_Be_Better
_Off_Without_Religion

veritas

P.S. contemno hominum = hater of men

veritas6464 said...

Hey Timster,...I only popped in to share a treat with you, however being how prolific you are lately –Hey! Another post: Excellent, apart from the 'hebrew' reference, this term is an anglicized bastardization of 'Ebre' the name of a tribe that the dirty ones also, pretend to be! Anyhoo; here's your treat:

Australian geologist Ian Plimer argues that, for many agnostics and atheists, the cause of environmentalism has replaced organized religion as a matter of personal faith.

-----

While the world's religions have inspired stunning acts of creation, they also have been implicated in some of the darkest deeds in human history.

If God cannot be blamed for such moments of evil, His priests and prophets at least have a case to answer.

So what might they say? That religion is unfairly blamed -- and that we should look to other factors? Admit that there are problems but argue that on balance the good outweighs the bad? That there is no alternative; the people need religion like they need air? - Intelligence Squared.

Ian Plimer is Emeritus Professor of Earth Sciences at the University of Melbourne and Professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide. He is a prominent critic of creationism, and is famous for a debate with creationist Duane Gish in which he asked his opponent to hold live electrical cables to prove that electromagnetism was 'only a theory'. He has published over 120 academic papers and six popular books. He is also a prominent member of the Australian Skeptics. In 2004 he was awarded the Clark Medal by the Royal Society of NSW. In the late 1990s, Plimer was involved in legal proceedings concerning the location of Noah's Ark, in which Plimer was ultimately unsuccessful. His most recent book, Telling Lies for God, has a forward by Archbishop Peter Hollingsworth. Professor Plimer argues that religion is important for the fabric of society.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idYdVQ6nwfA

http://fora.tv/2008/08/19/Would_We_Be_Better
_Off_Without_Religion

veritas

P.S. contemno hominum = hater of men

Timster said...

Wow...Great stuff veritas...thanks for the link.

well...ya run out of words for the tribe...jewjewjewjew...y'know?hahaha

Timster said...

Thanks Anon...I never met a man that agrees with me, that I didn't like.

Timster said...

Elvis...chaps?

Anonymous said...

Another example of sheeple Timster, the gay doubled, tripled, quadrupled, errrrr, multilied five fold when the so called role models and heroes decided to "comeout of the closet" What they were doin' in there is anyone's guess... cough. I am talkin' about Elton John, George Michael etc. etc. You can just see it can't you..... Wow, Elton is gay, lets me and you go buy his latest album John, and go listen to it together.... ok Pete, and maybe later we can have a go at this gay stuff, it must be cool if Elton does it huh Pete???? Sure thing John, but will have to be the one bendin' over, I got a sore back!!!!

Just another fine example of how morals have been debased and destroyed Timster.

Heroes and villains man, heroes and villains, one and the same.

Great article sir. Steve B

Timster said...

Thanks Steve...

Anonymous said...

Ok please tell me again why being mano e mano is selfish in a world of 7 billion two thirds of which are in constant fear of starvation. And you can,t see male beauty, well why would you make yourself unavailable to the other half? Also I find it a bit judgemental that many straits fantasize about female sodomy but condemn queers for the same butt sniffing indulgence!

Timster said...

Anony- Well, I don't know quite how to respond to these questions. Perhaps firstly, is that whether there are too many people in the world and how they are treated by the ruling Khazars, it seems to me...has little to do with the concept of the selfishness of homosexuality. Since the ultimate goal of a heterosexual union is indeed(no matter how it is dressed up in the media as "romance")propagation...yes, the homosexual lifestyle is based on a fruitless union...therefore intrinsically selfish. I don't really understand your comment about making myself "unavailable" to the other half? Perhaps you could further explain.
I don't fantasize about anal sex with anyone...male or female. I think it's a great way to spread disease from UTI to aids... I do however think that the predominance of it in modern porn is another jewish twist toward abnormality.
Lastly, my piece is not a condemnation of homosexuality...male of female. It is merely an observation that the jewish controlled MSM is ramming it down the throats of the MAJORITY(hence the ref. to democracy) of the people in the world that are NOT, or care to be, or have any tolerance for the details OF homosexuality. But they play it up as a "rights issue". When the latest same-sex marriage debate is mentioned in their media...it always the from the viewpoint of the poor trodden-upon homosexual. It's that holohoax syndrome thing. No one that I am aware of is seriously purposing that this alternate lifestyle be criminalized...so then why do we "straights" have to suffer a constant barrage of this, that is repellent to us on many levels...when gays represent a very small percentage of the whole? I will tell you why. Because whether you admit or not, homosexuality is by definition deviant(deviates from the norm?) behaviour...who better to champion the deviant that the deviants in charge?

Anonymous said...

Do you not in my backyard clowns at this site understand anything about the chemical and germ warfare that is a holocaust for baby boomer made to order queers completely set up over decades as a planned genocide ? This is not, I repeat not a moral issue. Its a survival issue. So stop blaming the victims and blame the real monsters at Fort Detrick who unleashed the HIV plague on the world starting with your queer sons who,ll you do nothing to defend because christianity has turned you into spiritual sawdust.

Timster said...

Normally I would opt out of publishing such comments...but sometimes we all need a chuckle.
Anon, you need help.

Elvis live @ Burger King said...

Chaps are cowboy pants for riding horses. They have no material at all in the seat or butt and are like regular pants otherwise. They are usually made of leather, fancy ones have tassles. Some gay men wear them for obvious reasons.

Timster said...

Elvis-yeah I know what chaps are...but I didn't get the homo-ref...yuk