Dogs And Fools...

As if all the analysis of Ed Snowden's whistle-blowing endeavors weren't enough for you, I guess I should chime in with mine. Not that I give a shit...on the surface...but in an effort to stay relevant, I will tell you what I think about this media explosion. The latest 'leaker'. The new Bradly Manning/Julian Assange. 

In a word:Bullshit.

 I brand this story thus, for two reasons. Wikileaks, videos of war atrocities and the power-point presentation that Mr.
Snowden dumped on the media all have a common thread. They are not denied by the PTB, nor their minions in their media.

Red flag alert!
 
If you think for even a second, that a power structure that can deny the validity of an avalanche of evidence, considering the real stories behind 9/11,(or Pearl Harbor, or Waco...or, hell, you pick)consistently over a period of many years, and yet they wouldn't just disregard Snowden's conspiracy theory, then you aren't thinking this thing through.
Mr. Snowden has a few power-point slides that I could make in 20 minutes. Oh...and a story to go with them. If in fact Mr. Snowden did indeed hold all of these top-secret positions, how difficult would it be for the NSA to disavow any knowledge of him? And by so doing, any 'conspiracy theories' that he came up with.  So what makes his theory a mainstream story? The mainstream itself. The MEDIUM is the message here. The medium is delivering you from evil. Not Ed Snowden. It is their decision. And since it has been

their decision to deride and or ignore all valid and provable evidence against the REAL atrocities, then I gotta kinda think, cui bono? Why now? Why this weak story? Why all the credence in the press.
Well, these are good questions. The ones that citizen journalism should be asking. Instead of jumping on board the 'hero' or 'traitor' bandwagons.  Is he part of this illusion that has generated all the media frenzy of a new blockbuster action movie? Or has he been set up to play the patsy for a larger agenda? I don't know. And neither do you. However, what you do know generally is how the media and the government work hand-in-hand...or you wouldn't be  here. You do have common sense. You do ask the uncomfortable questions.
A good rule of thumb is to believe nothing. Nothing you read. Nothing you hear. Nothing you see.

When I heard that Ed and Julian were communicating, it drove the final nail in the coffin of an otherwise heroic tale. So, alas, heroic tales are always just that. Tales. Too simple. Too heroic. What did Wikileaks actually reveal? Nothing. What was the true weight of the disclosures of Manning? Zilch. And what new info has Snowden brought to the table? Nothing that most everyone didn't already know.

Call me a skeptic. Call me a mal-content. Call me the Devil's advocate. But I have seen too much of this shit. This tail wagging the dog. While we are heatedly discussing Ed Snowden, 5,000 amerikan troops are on their way to Syria. While we are getting angry at Verizon, the jewish state has taken the decision to build even more jewish housing on even more stolen land in Palestine.
But this is just my take...and I'm just sayin.

"Stay Off My Clean Floors!"

Y'know, it is coming to the point at which I would rather watch the  deliberate lying in the mainstream media, than read the paranoid ramblings of conspiracy 'theorists'. They are really getting under my skin.
For one, these folks that we all could do without...either the 'truthers' that actually believe their own drivel...or the hasbara trolls, are muddying the brand of fact. I don't want to hear what you theorize actually happened. Or is happening. Or may happen. Your pet paranoia is as much unsubstantiated shit as the evening news. If you have an agenda from Tel-Aviv and are paid to troll the sites that seek facts not fiction...at least your are getting a paycheck and can be rather easily identified and disregarded.
Neither group will ever say those dreaded words: "I don't really know". Like the used car salesman, they  always have a ready answer to common-sense questions. 

"How did the illuminati get so much power when I have never met or even seen anyone that belongs to this group, or even heard of it except from you?" 

"Well, they are a secret society, aren't they? They do everything under the radar so that the common man is bamboozled without even knowing who did it...But I have figured it out!"

"Oh...you have, have you?" "Well, then, if they are that secret, you must be pretty smart to have penetrated their subterfuge, yes?"

I guess that is what these 'truthers' want. To be recognized for their brilliant detective work, and their undying concern for the well-being of we commoners. I keep wondering exactly whom is being bamboozled. Or should that be 'who'. I could never figure out the objective case in sentences like that. Oh, well.

"And the Masons are part of the illuminati!"

"Oh, really? Have you ever attended a Masonic meeting, or do you know any Masons? Is that how you made this conclusion?"

Well, no...but look at all of this symbology!" "It's everywhere!"

"Uh-huh". "See the DaVinci Code one too many times, have you?"

Of course, this view of mine concerning conspiracy theorists isn't very popular out here. Which probably accounts for my site's relatively low hit history. Those unhappy with the things that are going on in the world want answers. That is why they are out here looking. They don't want me to tell them anything but that I know who is rogering them behind their back. And their patience is wearing thin. So any snake-oil salesman, paid or not, attracts their attention, I guess. They want someone to blame. And the more shadowy and secretive they are told that the perpetrators of this world-wide shit is...well, the more they feel that they have been taken advantage of by ruthless people that are not above-board. And that these people have secret handshakes and symbols...if you just look hard enough.
I understand this. I sympathize to a point. But there are those at 'alternative news' sites and opinion blogs that take advantage of this. And they are tracking mud on our clean floors. And you are letting them.

I recently read an article on Marilyn Monroe that answered more questions than it posed. If that is possible. There is more he-said-she-said in the piece than a holocaust expose'. And although I agree that there were a lot of shady goings-on concerning MM's career, spreading rumors about MKULTRA and some silly-assed theory of 'Presidential Monarchs" would be laughable to anyone with half a brain between their ears, if it didn't feed this childish fear monster that is 'conspiracy theory'. It is ironic that the author of this and other articles just as ridiculous calls themselves "vigilant citizen". I can see this person banging away at their keyboard, feverishly reading their previous paragraph and following the logical progression of a fairy tale. Then going back in to the piece afterward and googling other 'theorists' shite to back up their own masterpiece. Vigilant indeed. Oh dear. Surely, we are better than this?
Surely, we are smarter than this.
I really don't want to see this kind of junk become the standard. But what's a mother to do? Well, cull your reading habits for one. As you throw the talmud-vision in the shit can...you can also strike these types of sites off your daily reading list.  But that's as may be.

Back to clean floors. Citizen journalism has its drawbacks obviously. As many as the old type of reportage. Each are subject to editorializing and agendas and advertising. All of these bother me.
But none more than vain editorializing under the guise of 'fact'. That is the biggest weapon the MSM uses against us. It should never be used out here. But for various reasons, usually vanity, used, it is. Constantly.
Now I can say that it is my opinion that a handful of blood-sucking khazars seized upon Marilyn and rode her for everything she was worth. And I can give you the tribal names and dates, but beyond that, I certainly cannot tell you what happened in that bungalow bedroom on the evening of the 5th of August in 1962. No one is left to tell you what actually transpired...nor would anyone have in 1962, I would wager(although that is speculation...not fact). So unless you are an eyewitness, have photographs, blood samples et al...shut the fuck up? Don't pose your inane theories as fact. We don't need that kind of journalism. Never did.
This goes for the Masonic Lodge, the non-existent 'Illuminati', devil worshipers, Lady Gaga's secret(well, not-so-secret)symbolic hand gestures and gowns, reptilian Queens and whatever else your 'vigilant' little fairy-tale brain can manufacture in your Mom's basement. K?

And stop tracking mud on our clean floors!
And tell the milkman, NO MORE CHEESE!





 

Moral Relativism: 101

Is there a universal morality? One born of common sense rules of human dignity that span all cultures? Should there be? And if not, why not? This question has plagued we monkeys for ages. Of course those that wish to sit at the top of the heap would have us believe that we cannot judge one culture by the standards of another. Thereby granting them immunity from all other cultures when and if they play by rules contrary to most other groups. The jewish culture is such an example. They are quick to point out that the actions of their terrorist camp inside occupied Palestine are justified in preserving a jewish homeland. Anything and everything laid down in their holy books is allowed to preserve this separatist members-only culture.

 

And such a book. If you take the time to actually read the talmud, the torah and the pentateuch(the jewish first five books of the old testament)you will discover a carte-blanche for wanton murder, child-rape, virulent racism and generally hell-bent-for-leather justification for the most atrocious human behaviour known to our species. All kept in reserve as moral relativism. Behavior that cannot be questioned by those outside the hebrew persuasion. No matter how inhuman. It is not the concern of Gentiles. No rational judgement can be made about these rules by which the yiddish operate. Period. Even the most casual criticism is labeled race hatred, or g_d-forbid, the most dreaded label: anti-semitism. The rest of the world's cultures are held hostage by this ad-hominem meant to demonize the critic and defer the validity of the criticism. But this tactic doesn't work the way it used to.
If we are talking about such cultural differences as diet, clothing, religious traditions practiced within a group/culture...I think that a universal morality could be perhaps bent a bit. A blind eye could be turned by the world to burkas and lutefisk.
Many say that moral relativism fails as a moral system simply because it cannot arbitrate disagreements. I agree.

Organized crime in amerika as depicted in the headlines of its infancy and hollywood films, left our populace horrified. Although most of the criminals were actually of the above mentioned tribe of talmud followers, Italian mobsters were to become iconic. They murdered and robbed their way to infamy and are said even yet to control the seedier side of our society. Well, that is a myth. However, let us assume for a moment that this type of criminal behaviour was indeed borne of the Italian culture. One which immigrants had brought with them to the land of opportunity. What exactly did they do? Well, according to news reports of the day and the fear-mongering of hollwood, they had gang wars, brought gambling and bootleg liquor to the public and robbed banks. Aside from the occasional crossfire accidental killings of non-gangster folks...I don't see a downside. But maybe that's just me. No one cried foul, however...from these Italian gangster camps. They understood that they were breaking the laws in their host country and were either killed or imprisoned without a peep about anti-Italianism. I wonder why that is? Well, partly because these organized crime bosses were not in fact necessarily Italian at all and were for the most part jewish. And partly because those that were actually Italian/Sicilian borne, held the same morality that most Gentile societies praise.

But there is another side to this 'relativism' question. 

If 1 of 3 kids stealing cookies is caught, I don't feel that he can point to the others and maintain a rational defense by declaring that: "The other two guys are just as guilty and so I should go free!" "Why are you singling me out?" Or perhaps: "Since I wasn't the only one taking the cookies, the rule against stealing them should be questioned!"  Being the one caught does not excuse the crime. That is not a valid defense in my book. But so few read my book...maybe I'm wrong. I may just be trapped in my own culture's morality.

Isn't this what we are hearing today coming out of the mouths of the  Abe Foxman's and Alan Dershowitz's? How dare we hold these zionist racist scum to the same standards with which we would judge any group? The nerve of we. It is all relative. Morally speaking, that is.

Partly Cloudy Or Partly Sunny

I try not to get too personal here. I try to keep my day-to-day experiences out of that picture that I am trying to paint. It's hard to do so.
But I attempt it. 
I guess it is a hide-and-seek endeavor that all writers(good or bad)feel they need to play. To make it personal for the reader, and yet not autobiographical. But should we? If I find that I'm getting too far into someone's observations and that they are merely the author's own experience, I tend to shy away. TMI. Keep it generic, I say. Otherwise you are tapping into soap-opera territory. Not a good thing. It could be the truth that I am seeking to relate as a writer, but if I get too personal, it becomes my truth only. Keep it universal. Keep it man-on-the-street.

Then there are days when I want to bitch about how my hair was cut. Or how noisy my neighbors are. Or what a perfect day it turned out to be, on the upside. These are mundane concerns in the scope of what I write. And should remain so, inasmuch as they have no intrinsic value to proving some point or other.
But I am finding that to be more and more difficult. We are the sum of all of our experience. All that. I guess then the key is to strike a happy medium in which our personal experience is germane. 

So back to partly cloudy. It is today. Not just here. I totally agree

with the 'global-warming' crowd. The entire world is heating up. And those living in the multimillion dollar homes on the beach are going to find themselves scrambling for dry ground very soon. But the heat is not coming from nitrogen or cfc's. It is coming from friction. The friction of applying too much pressure on moving objects. These objects would be you and I. We move around a lot here under these partly cloudy skies. Pushing boulders up that hill for the man lounging in his beach home.

As you know, I am a big fan of the late author, Joseph Campbell. His knowledge of the mythology of our species played a large part in the creation of Star Wars. The original three films were simple age-old tales that repeated to their viewers, the archetype of good versus evil. The underdog becoming triumphant. The Empire versus the rebels. Were these theater goers paying attention? Did they understand the "Empire"?
Did they see it for its all-encompassing presence?  Do they have the mental capabilities to grasp the significance of the tale? I wonder. 
For as Campbell implied, the purpose of myth is basically instructional.

It seems simple to me. Why, for instance, did we immediately identify with the heroes of the tale as opposed to the all-pervasive Empirical forces? Were the rebels more likable? More "us"?  Was Obiwan more the type of guy that you would have over to dinner, than Vader? Well, of course he was. But the tale could just have easily been written differently. The Emperor could have been seen as the protector of a secure one-galaxy government with the common good always at the fore. And the rebel alliance could have been highlighted as neer-do-well malcontents bent on destruction and for its own sake. Funny that. How tales unfold. How they can mimic life outside the theater. Outside the campfire light. Outside the narrative of a well written book. Or they can be rewritten to suit the author's preference.

But that aside, let's change lanes.
Roger Waters recently wrote a heartfelt letter to Alicia Keys. One more blow against the Empire. And the Emperor is hopping mad.
The musician known for bricks in walls, just won't shut up. Good for him.

But would Luke Skywalker have joined the alliance if his Aunt and  Uncle weren't slaughtered by empirical soldiers? I doubt it. It is and always was a matter of pushing too far. Creating that warming trend under these cloudy skies. Squeezing too hard until more of those you squeeze, "slip through your fingers". Even Luke will do it when his time on the throne comes. That is the way clouds drift. They always have. They always will.
The cyclical nature of man is as predictable as those clouds that come and go above us. It is just how they are perceived. Partly sunny to partly cloudy. With an ever-present chance of revolution.

Reaction...

We are supposed to react a certain way.  It has been scripted and if you keep your thumb on the lines you can walk through this with me. We were cast in these dumb parts and by god we are going to have to rehearse till we get it right.

I once had aspirations of being an actor. I studied it seriously. Not treading the boards necessarily, although I did a bit of that too. I wanted to be James Dean, or Brando. Film was the thing. I studied under a waaaaaay off-Broadway director. He was so far off the white-way that we were practically standing in the Hudson. Well, that was okay. I learned a lot. About how to listen. If you can't listen, you can't act. Because you cannot respond in a natural way if you do not know what it is your supposed to be responding to.
And that's important. It seems I have forgotten how to respond to things...prompts...from everyday life. I'm listening, but by my unusual responses, I am altering the author's intent. You can do that. It isn't difficult and it will infuriate a playwright to no end.
When I didn't like leading an audience down the playwright's path, I could hack out a new one that made a mockery of his lines. Kinda fun. And maybe why I never got very far in the field. Who knows.

I find myself doing it again. When I hear, for example that an insane Muslim has just hacked off the head of a British soldier in the street...well, you might just as well tell me that there's a sale at Penny's. "Oh my gawd...really?...a sale?" "Was there a lot of blood?"

Because, I have been auditioning for these plays for so long now, that I know that the sale will end in two days and things will be marked back up, I am thinking "what's the point?"  I don't go to the sales events. I invest little time in commerce of any stripe. And the purveyors of these sales, at Penny's or in the bloody gutters, don't really require my participation anyway. I am not right for the part. Too good-looking. Too old. Too tall. Too something. Just not right, y'know?
I have noted over the years that British actors will do anything for money. To keep working. That is very foreign to many people outside the UK. Lawrence Olivier, for instance, thought no more of lending his considerable talents to Clash of the Titans than playing Richard III.
Both paid well. Both kept him in the public eye. It must be the

amerikan obsession with celebrity and yiddish press that personifies an actor here. Makes their public feel that they know them personally and how they would never sink to doing something beneath their dignity...no matter how much it paid. Dignity. Funny, I thought the British were supposed to have invented that transient emotion. For that is all it is, I guess. It doesn't exist in the dark.
But that's as may be. 
It's a matter of credulity, I think. If I see Helen Mirren playing Portia one week, then the next week see her using her craft trying to convince me that a gutter-turd like Phil Spector is really an okay guy.. and the next week she is the Queen conferring semi-royal last wishes...well, it's a matter of belief. It doesn't seem to matter that she or Olivier drew a paycheck. To we that watch it becomes

political very quickly.
I would never have done that. Taken on a role that didn't suit me and my sensibilities. Or...maybe I would. It seems I am being asked to daily.

"OMG! THEY CUT HIS HEAD OFF?"
"THOSE BASTARDS!!!"

Let me try it again with more conviction...

But maybe the Brits have it in perspective. Maybe it's we the viewers that should exercise this 'integrity' of which I speak. So if John Cleese needs to pay his mortgage by using his comedic talents to sell israeli yogurt, then we should look away and remember him as Basil Fawlty only. I should excuse Mirren her trespasses against my sensibilities and think of her only as Prospera or Jane Tennison.
For actors are paid by those that want the play. And if the play is meant to garner a reaction, as Olivier produced in me when I saw him as Hamlet, perhaps that is all. Remember the play not the actors. For the play is the thing. And our reaction is all.

Absolutes...

I don't care for them.  Absolutes. I have found that they, for the most  part, don't exist. Nothing you can do can make them exist. Sorry. Like those confounded exceptions to rules in the English language, there are always exceptions to everything around us.

I think it is high time for a new enlightenment. That last one didn't  last. With a more socialist viewpoint that swept Europe in the 18th century also came a more humanist vision of religion. Neither endured. The yoke was eventually replaced. Fear did that. Those who didn't want to work and to live in luxury used the emotion. It is just a personality trait. Not conspiracy. Seeing conspiracy is as fearful as the religion/wars that the above mentioned have used to control. Maybe worse. Because seeing conspiracy where none exists is an absolute. And absolutes just aren't the way of things.

Now, I do a lot of jabbering on here about jews and zionism. Some take that to believe that I think that all jews are Satan's spawn and all that adhere to zionism long for world-wide domination by the 'chosen ones'. This is not true. I do not believe that. I do believe that religion itself is the culprit behind most of man's woes. Judaism just makes no bones about it. In its doctrines can be found everything that is inherently evil about all religions;only spelled out. Where all other faiths of the world operate from the premise that their god is the only god, and their holy book is the only real truth, these other religions are forbidden to act upon such assumptions by assuming that they are somehow better than all other humans by virtue of their holy convictions.
I harbor particular hatred for judaism because it cuts to the chase.
It makes no pretense. If your mother was a jew, then you are better than every other human unlucky enough not to have a jewess for a mom. Cut and dried. No room for debate. An absolute. I hate absolutes. They are as dangerous and stupid as a treed raccoon.


-All jews are evil

-All white people are good

-All anything is anything


Ain't gonna  wash. But you know all this. No matter how much you wish things to be a certain way...it just doesn't happen like that. Same with belief in a supreme being which you cannot see. It would be nice to know that someone who knows how to get things done and get them done right, is watching over us. But. When that isn't the way things are happening, you can't spend your life making up excuses for why this old bearded guy isn't delivering like your holy book says he will. I've known people that are complete assholes, living their entire lives in luxury by screwing over other people. These jerks never feel any retribution for their ill-gotten exorbitance. They just slide through life as if it was tailored just for them and die at a very old age munching on caviar. I have also known pious individuals get the shit kicked outta them by life. No matter which way they turn, they get a knuckle sandwich from providence. Absolutes don't seem to work on these people.
But of course they wouldn't. Absolutes are generally ascribed to religious concepts. Not to humans. So there again, we toddle down that "if only" path.
I see no evidence that any supreme entity is watching over us, so I don't recognize the concept of absolute. Because, as I have observed, the term does not ever apply to something so dynamic as human behaviour. So there.
What am I saying here? Nothing about human behaviour is entire or all-inclusive...except that it is what it is. Groups of people can be taught and believe the most fucked up notions imaginable...but that doesn't mean that this is a constant even within the group. Especially when it comes to mixing screwed up values being ascribed to biology. I would think that is common sense.
But not absolutely.

So when a 'conspiracy theorist' tells me that all belonging to some group are dedicated to a covert plan of some sort merely because of the accident of their birth...well, I gotta think that they don't know people very well. And they are as scared as that raccoon looking down on the barking dog. It may serve the raccoon well to deal in absolutes in the future, like stay the hell away from dogs...as a rule. But surely we are a bit higher in that tree and can see a bit further and more clearly.
But what do I know?

Note To Self...

I always have something to say. So typing these bits of wisdom occasionally is not a problem. When I come across something in the news, I'm more than happy to give you my take on them. And I am always right. Well, almost always. When I am not it makes me happy. Because as you know...I am a gloom-and-doomer from way back. So being right for me usually means
the worst-case-scenario has played out as I predicted. I hate that.
Note to self: Be more positive;when possible.

But it is not an especially unusual talent that I have for seeing the dark side of things. I wouldn't even call it a talent. This inclination to see the dark side of even the most encouraging news. Maybe just a logical response to news. And I think the news encourages that. I may be wrong.
News. I question the very nature of such a beast. I don't believe any of it, and there is nothing 'new' about it, save the fact that it is in the now. But driven by those that produce and twist and turn events to their purpose.

Gay marriage in France.
Isra-hell threatening yet again.
Sex scandals abound in the Gentile world.
Missiles here and missals there...all being moved around like pieces on a chess-board.
Pope without a Pope-mobile.
Alignments here and alignments there.

If one cannot see patterns here...well then they are part of the pattern. It's hard to understand where you are if you can't see over the maze walls. Fear and hunger push us on through the puzzle.

I am amazed that so many men are clueless when it comes to the fairer sex. Perhaps that is the problem they have. They do not view them as humans. I dunno. It seems every woman that I have spent any time with...has gone on to excel in life. Not because of my influence. But due to the lack of it, I think. I never tried to block any ambition of the women that I have known...and there have been scores of them. But that is part of the puzzle, I also think. And perhaps precisely why there have been scores and not just one. The nuclear family is fading into a mist. Perhaps I have contributed to that new paradigm unwittingly.  Perhaps this is caused by social engineering...I dunno. It would be easy to point to recent trends in defense of such an opinion. Women's rights. Gay rights. Pornography. All driven by tribal leanings, I agree. But if the general populace is not happy with things as they have become, I can't help but think there would be resistance. Well, at least more than I see.  Note to self: If people truly don't like something, they will change it. 

All of the above phenomena have played out in the media like a football match. Huge hot-button topics, each side of which has its followers.



I read that "Sore losers can't accept that France legalized gay marriage". As if it was just a game lost. Nothing more. Most of the world was against the 'gay team' but they had a great backfield and managed to score the winning goal. "We'll get em next time". But wait...there isn't a 'next time'. This was the final match. Win-or-go-home took on a different meaning for the French this week. As it has in the states.  Hi-ho.  Note to self: Sexuality of our species is a game.
So what did the winning team win? Among other things they won the right to massage our species legally. To be at the forefront of raising children of the future in an alien environment.  One that will become more commonplace within a few generations.

I had cousins that were raised by a 'couple' of homosexual women. They grew up. They had children naturally. Maybe they are screwed up mentally when it comes to sexual roles. I dunno. I never asked them. I'm sure that they battled with a lot of mixed-signals...as we all have. Maybe more.  I am not a homophobe. I don't think. Nothing about alternative sexuality scares me. Disgust is a different matter, but I try not to judge. Well, most of the time anyway. I just try to see trends and how they affect our species. In a very anthropological sense. I see the hand of the khazar in most of these rapid species shifts, however. Usually leading us to toward the dead ends of the maze.  But maybe that's just me.  Note to self:try to understand the social benefits of alternative sexual identity.

I have a lot of notes to myself. I have to keep myself in check and remind myself of many things all the time. Curbing my tongue is one of these that I just can't seem to get the hang of.
Note to self: Don't try. 


 
     

Hypocrisy...

Ya Think?

There was an age or two, they tell me, in which the elders were revered in every social setting. They were used as guides in coming times because of their wisdom. Well, wisdom is subjective they say. But is it? Do our senior citizens have anything to tell us today? I guess I should know; approaching such a time in life. 
Life is larger now. Billions of people on this spinning sphere, where only millions were before. But does that change wisdom as it was once honored? Is it relevant? Was it ever? Didn't we muddle though the ages depending on a tried-and-true vision of the universe supplied by those that had been through it all before? And is just 'muddling through' enough anymore?
All good questions, to be sure. There are so many opinions being ventured. Surely there is a synthesis. A point at which we can stand back from ourselves and view a common sense solution to how we proceed rationally. Surely. Well, there are those among us that would have us focus narrowly on the issues that effect us. For love or money. For profit and vanity. And there are those that would have us hearken back to the good old days that were neither old nor good. Any port in a storm. And a squall is appearing in the near distance.

I have often wondered how many of us have lived. I'm sure some anthropologist/statistician has figured that number out to a man. And I don't know what I would do with such a huge number if I had it at my fingertips. Perhaps I am looking for a perspective. A Rosetta stone of sorts that would provide the answer to why we seem to have gone astray. Plugging this figure into an equation, along with other variables would produce an x=oops kind of conclusion that could not be denied. 
But alas...I doubt it. 
If the good-old-days were so good...I guess we wouldn't have changed things. Or if we did, we had damned good reasons to do so. To make them better new days. But I'm not seeing that. 
I am above quite a few mundane and negligible concerns. To me, most all the problems that face the common man(or woman) are merely symptoms of a disease that could have been avoided had we listened to our elders before they passed away. Maybe I have risen above these symptoms because I see them as just that. Sitting here in this lofty position of "Elder". And maybe...just maybe...the same fundamental issues that plagued our forefathers are still kicking

around. 
Of course, I would point to religion as being the invader to the body human. And one particular 'religion' that does not rely on the masses to follow, for it to work it's particular regressive spell. One that, above all others, does not attempt to convert. The one that most all of our past elders warned us of.  The one with patience. The underlying disease that has plagued a burgeoning species for too long. And as Bill Maher says...it rhymes with 'da blues'.

I have always liked the blues. Black blues. Not white men in sunglasses and odd hats. Billie Holiday type blues. The tribe whose namesake rhymes with above, also likes them. They identify with that lonely depressing feeling, I suppose. I have read time and time again about some blues artist or other that met an early demise because of tribal influence in their careers. Those talented musicians that were led to booze or drugs or both, by the leeches that clung to their expression of sorrow. That always made me wonder. The more substances these jews fed such black artists, the deeper into the sorrow they performed. Until they were used up.

Billy Holiday, Robert Johnson, Charlie Parker et al were seduced by the lure of heightened chemical performance provided by their friendly yiddish managers. Talent raped and distorted. Time and time again. And as talented as these people were, they always died penniless. Of course the ashkanzim that have run the entertainment business for over a century in the West have done this to countless artists, no matter what the genre. But, I dunno...the blues scene just irks me. The tribe that stole, shipped and enslaved Africans seem to take particular delight in listening to, and exploiting the sorrow that they caused. Go figure.
But back to the elders. What is it that they all have seemed to agree upon over the ages? Maybe those things are the ones that we should rubber-band back to. I know(even though it is poopooed and lied about)that one thing stands out. Expel the jew. 
So, ya think that might just be a good idea? As opposed to the opposite, which is supporting the jew's bastard offspring, zionism.
Ya think?     

Pretense...

There are a lot of things swirling around the drain like it is business as usual. I'm here to tell you it ain't. As the last of accountability and common-sense morality circles away, their demise is being sped up by gravity and people are noticing the sucking sound. Even those that didn't see the eddy forming just a few years ago. Liquid does that. Finds a way. It changes shape as it diminishes and it will always seek its own level. I guess we are tying to get a stopper in place here.
Something else is happening out here. You can dismiss it as vain, but I notice a small amount of my blog protocols being mimicked. I can also notice phrases and observations that I use being...well, I hate to use the word 'plagiarized'...because everything here is free to copy, and I couldn't be happier if anything I put forth is used again somewhere else. I see it is as flattering, and I also see it as advancing the cause.

Because I see a synthesis forming, however slowly, toward a herd-think that is encouraging to say the least. And because I am just a miniscule portion of that effort, I see others being copied over and over again, in ever-increasing locations on the net. A final form for alternative discourse is being modeled and I am proud to have played a mere walk-on part. I guess that is the one of the main differences between 'us-and-them'. They would sue. We contribute things worth repeating willingly, as a team-effort. A conversational meme being carved out in which every valid observation plays a role.  We are, at the end of the day, thinking animals, and that is being manifest. Very encouraging.

Perhaps even more so when I see pretense swirling away too. 
We all know why the West is engaged in warring imperialism. It is obvious to we that cannot control our edacious leadership...and to those that are being devoured. The ones doing the devouring are seeing less and less need to explain and justify their dark deeds. That hubris with which they pound their chests in imagined  superiority will be their downfall because "it will follow, as night the day" that this pride will come before their fall. 
I believe that a 'meme' is also forming in the camp of the enemy. One that declares, "Why should we superior beings bow to the masses and even attempt to justify our actions, when it is obvious that they wouldn't understand?"  Therein lies their doom. More and more, I see this in their media. The 'how dare you question', attitude. Well, daring is right up my alley...as you are probably aware(see masthead). And I am as pleased as punch to see this posture from them. It means they have already failed. The rest is just carnage. Theirs. The argument has been decided in our favor. There is no more debate. They are wrong. We are right. Defense of their position is futile.

I know a few things about pretending. So do you. You can pretend all you want, but at some time the sun starts to go down and it is time for supper. That means gather up all your costumes,cap pistols and tiaras and head home. It was fun while it lasted if you didn't take it too seriously. We all grew up with those that did. They either wound up in the funny-farm...or at the head of corporations,still living out their fantasy lies. Unfortunately, not enough went to the rubber-room resort, and we allow some of them to continue their faux lives of power. But even supper time comes for them, eventually. And they may have to go to bed without their evening meal. Because those few of which I speak want to keep their costumes on long after play has ceased. They really believe they were kings.  Of course we know better, but have been reticent to call them on it. Until recently when they they have pushed the limits of their delusions. 
I think the time is quickly approaching when we follow their lead in dropping the pretense. To stop pretending that we subscribe to their grandiose self-appraisal so that everyone can get back to reality, have some supper and get a good night's sleep. Because tomorrow, if anything, is going to be very real.